Trust process
Reviewer standards for evidence-first supplement content.
EverPrime is building a reviewer bench for content where clinical, pharmacy, nutrition, or research context materially changes the quality of the answer. The standard is narrow expertise, clean conflicts, and conservative wording.
Credential fit
Reviewer candidates must have a relevant clinical, pharmacy, nutrition, or research credential for the supplement topic they review.
Conflict screen
EverPrime screens for supplement-brand ownership, undisclosed affiliate incentives, and claims patterns that would weaken editorial independence.
Evidence behavior
Reviewers need to be comfortable saying evidence is limited, context-dependent, or not strong enough for a broad recommendation.
Scope discipline
Reviewer credit is limited to the content area they can evaluate. A scientific review is not represented as personal medical advice.
What reviewer credit means
Reviewer credit means a qualified person reviewed the educational content for evidence framing, clinical context, and obvious safety gaps. It does not mean the content is a diagnosis, treatment plan, prescription, or substitute for care from a clinician who knows the reader's history.
Until a named reviewer signs a page, EverPrime marks relevant schema and bylines as pending review instead of implying completed clinician review.
Related trust pages
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. Not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Generated by AI. Always verify with a healthcare professional. Educational information only. Not a substitute for professional medical advice.